NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / October 4, 2022 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.
LFST Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/lifestance-health-lawsuit-loss-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
SFIX Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/stitch-fix-class-action-loss-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
TWTR Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/twitter-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *
LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:LFST)
This lawsuit is on behalf of all purchasers of LifeStance common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the documents issued in connection with LifeStance's June 10, 2021 initial public stock offering.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : October 11, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/lifestance-health-lawsuit-loss-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, (i) the number of virtual visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance Health was decreasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby flatlining LifeStance Health's out-patient/virtual revenue growth; (ii) the percentage of in-person visits clients were undertaking utilizing LifeStance Health was increasing as the COVID-19 lockdowns were being lifted, thereby causing LifeStance Health's operating expenses to increase substantially; (iii) LifeStance Health had lost a large number of physicians due to burn-out and, as a result, its physician retention rate had fallen significantly below the 87% highlighted in the initial public offering's registration statement, and LifeStance Health had been expending additional costs to onboard new physicians who were less productive than the outgoing physicians they were replacing; and (iv) as a result, LifeStance Health's business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as the initial public offering's registration statement represented.
Stitch Fix, Inc. (NASDAQ:SFIX)
This lawsuit is on behalf of purchasers of Stitch Fix Class A common stock between December 8, 2020, and March 8, 2022, inclusive.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : October 25, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/stitch-fix-class-action-loss-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, Stitch Fix made numerous false and misleading statements to investors concerning the synergy between the Company's Fix and Freestyle programs, and repeatedly denied claims that the Freestyle program could cannibalize the Company's legacy Fix business. Specifically, Stitch Fix repeatedly assured investors that the Company's Freestyle business was 'an additive experience' and 'complementary' to the Fix business, that 'the combination of those two things will allow us to address many more types of clients,' and that 'we see solid growth in both sides of the business.' In truth, Stitch Fix concealed that these programs were not complementary or additive. Stitch Fix knew that the Freestyle program would be much preferred to the Company's original Fix model and that the Freestyle program would inevitably cannibalize the Company's legacy Fix business.
Twitter, Inc. (NYSE:TWTR)
TWTR Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased August 3, 2020 - August 23, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : November 14, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/twitter-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32422&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Twitter, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Twitter knew about security concerns on their platform; (2) Twitter actively worked to hide the security concerns from the board, the investing public, and regulators; (3) contrary to representations in its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Twitter did not take steps to improve security; (4) Twitter's active refusal to address security issues increased the risk of loss of public goodwill; and (5) as a result, defendants' statements about Twitter's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
You have until the lead plaintiff deadlines to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Levi & Korsinsky is a nationally recognized firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
View source version on accesswire.com: