NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / October 4, 2022 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.
DDL Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/dingdong-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
ABT Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/abbott-laboratories-class-action-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
FLGT Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/fulgent-genetics-lawsuit-loss-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd. (NYSE:DDL)
This lawsuit is on behalf of persons who purchased, or otherwise acquired, Dingdong American Depository Shares pursuant or traceable to the F-1 registration statements and related prospectus on Form 424B4 issued in connection with Dingdong's June 2021 initial public stock offering.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : October 24, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/dingdong-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, the registration statement and prospectus used to effectuate the Company's initial public offering misstated and/or omitted facts concerning Dingdong's so-called commitment to ensuring the safety and quality of the food it distributes to the market. For example, despite claiming that it applies 'stringent quality control across [its] entire supply chain to ensure product quality to [its] users,' Dingdong sold food past its sell-by date. Consequently, Dingdong was, in fact, no better at providing or assuring access to 'fresh' groceries than the supermarkets, traditional Chinese wet markets, or traditional e-commerce platforms it repeatedly claimed to be displacing. Moreover, the foregoing conduct subjected Dingdong to an increased risk of regulatory and/or governmental scrutiny and enforcement, all of which, once revealed, were likely to negatively impact Dingdong's business, operations, and reputation.
Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT)
This lawsuit is on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of Abbott common stock during the period from February 19, 2021, to June 8, 2022, inclusive.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : October 31, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/abbott-laboratories-class-action-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, defendants touted the strength of Abbott's infant formula brands and their contribution to the Company's sales and revenue growth, despite knowing that the facility that manufactured those products was in flagrant violations of United States Food and Drug Administration ('FDA') health, safety, and manufacturing regulations. The complaint further alleges that defendants willfully or recklessly concealed these violations from investors, even though the violations put Abbott's infant formula business in dire jeopardy and left the Company exposed to a risk of severe regulatory action, including the recall of its products and closure of the Sturgis facility. Indeed, according to the complaint, defendants received direct warnings, communications, FDA inspection reports, and consumer complaints identifying in detail the safety and regulatory violations that were rampant at the Sturgis facility.
Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FLGT)
FLGT Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased March 22, 2019 - August 4, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : November 21, 2022
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/fulgent-genetics-lawsuit-loss-submission-form?prid=32418&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Fulgent had been conducting medically unnecessary laboratory testing, engaging in improper billing practices in relation to laboratory testing, and providing or receiving remuneration in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law; (ii) accordingly, Fulgent was likely to become subject to enhanced legal and regulatory scrutiny; (iii) Fulgent's revenues, to the extent they were derived from the foregoing unlawful conduct, were unsustainable; (iv) the foregoing, once revealed, was likely to subject the Company to significant financial and/or reputational harm; and (v) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
You have until the lead plaintiff deadlines to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Levi & Korsinsky is a nationally recognized firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
View source version on accesswire.com: